NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla K40c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA Tesla K40c

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 745 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 245 Watt
Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5339 vs 4495
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 348 vs 325
Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19845 vs 17468

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 January 2018 vs 8 October 2013
Core clock speed	1152 MHz vs 745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 245 Watt
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5339 vs 4495
PassMark - G2D Mark	348 vs 325
Geekbench - OpenCL	19845 vs 17468

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c

2.6x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
3.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 768
Around 97% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 61.566 vs 54.188
Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1779.043 vs 1159.046
Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.463 vs 5.507
Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 103.169 vs 82.067
Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 308.261 vs 293.638

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	178.8 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2880 vs 768
Floating-point performance	4,291 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	61.566 vs 54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1779.043 vs 1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.463 vs 5.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	103.169 vs 82.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	308.261 vs 293.638

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40c

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5339

4495

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

348

325

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

19845

17468

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

54.188

61.566

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1159.046

1779.043

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.507

6.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

82.067

103.169

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

293.638

308.261

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA Tesla K40c
PassMark - G3D Mark	5339	4495
PassMark - G2D Mark	348	325
Geekbench - OpenCL	19845	17468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	54.188	61.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1159.046	1779.043
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.507	6.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	82.067	103.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	293.638	308.261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2219

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA Tesla K40c
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP107	GK110B
Launch date	3 January 2018	8 October 2013
Place in performance rating	530	533
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$7,699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1417 MHz
Core clock speed	1152 MHz	745 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,177 gflops	4,291 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	2880
Texture fill rate	68.02 GTexel / s	178.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	245 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB / s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready