NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 5830
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and ATI Radeon HD 5830 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 52% higher texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 44.8 GTexel / s
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 1,792.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5339 vs 1733
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 25 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1152 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s vs 44.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops vs 1,792.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5339 vs 1733 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5830
- Around 46% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 768
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 348
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1120 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 vs 348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5830
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | ATI Radeon HD 5830 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5339 | 1733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | 402 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19845 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | ATI Radeon HD 5830 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GP107 | Cypress |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 25 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 530 | 529 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1152 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | 1,792.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s | 44.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 282 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity |