NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA GRID K280Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GRID K280Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 745 MHz
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 2,289 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 versus 2840
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 6555
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 1312
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 6555
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 1312
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 28 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 745 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 2,289 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 versus 2840 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 6555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 1312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 6555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 1312 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K280Q
- Environ 23% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 95.36 GTexel / s versus 77.76 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 768
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 versus 323
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3562 versus 3336
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3562 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.36 GTexel / s versus 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 768 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 versus 323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3562 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3562 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K280Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 2840 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 6555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 1312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 6555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 1312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3562 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GRID K280Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 28 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 545 | 548 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,875 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
