NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1188 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 38.02 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- 2x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,217 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 4890
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 4890
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 17 November 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1188 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 38.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 1,217 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 4890 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 4890 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20094 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 4890 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 4890 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP106B | GM206 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 17 November 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 554 | 433 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 1,217 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 38.02 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
