NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 776 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 288
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 894.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 102 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 83% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 3828 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 2006
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1914
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1914
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 776 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 288 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 894.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 102 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 3828 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 vs 2006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 1914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 1914 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 443 vs 323
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 443 vs 323 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 2006 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 443 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20687 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 1914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 1914 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GP106B | GF114 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 24 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 563 | 565 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 776 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 894.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 288 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 102 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 91.9 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3828 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireMV 2250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5010M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
