NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1029 MHz
• Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• Around 79% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 79% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 3465
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 312
• Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20734 vs 12495
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 49.772
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 757.295
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 3.67
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 179.567
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 5157
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 5157

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.875 vs 24.676
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3687
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3336
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3687
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 3465
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20734 12495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 49.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 757.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 3.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 49.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 179.567
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 7859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 7859

Compare specifications (specs)