NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 902 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 30.133
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 148.747
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3582
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3582
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 10 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3331 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 173.2 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- Around 67% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 vs 843.503
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 5.071
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 vs 24.676
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 8496
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 8496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 173.2 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 2,488 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 vs 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 vs 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 vs 24.676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 vs 8496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1441.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3331 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP106B | GK110B |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 10 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 556 | 554 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 173.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
