NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 924 MHz
• Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 81 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 5709
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20734 vs 19038
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 59.428
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.157
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 81.909
• Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 2286

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 385 vs 323
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1113.788 vs 843.503
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.101 vs 24.676
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 vs 8496

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5919 5709
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 385
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20734 19038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 59.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 1113.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 4.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 39.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 81.909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 8546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 8546
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 2286

Compare specifications (specs)