NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 45% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 1029 MHz
- Environ 49% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- Environ 79% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 79% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 versus 3465
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 versus 312
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20734 versus 12495
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 49.772
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 757.295
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 3.67
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 179.567
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 5157
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 5157
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 1029 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 versus 3465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 versus 312 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 versus 12495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 49.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 757.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 3.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 179.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 5157 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.875 versus 24.676
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 versus 3687
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 versus 3336
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 versus 3687
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 versus 3336
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 versus 24.676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 3465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 312 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 | 12495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 49.772 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 757.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 3.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 49.875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 179.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 5834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 7859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 5834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 7859 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 556 | 553 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
