NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Environ 97% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 756 MHz
- Environ 66% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 977 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 31.26 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 1,000 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 versus 2803
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20661 versus 7907
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 3854
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 3854
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 756 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 977 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 1,000 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 versus 2803 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20661 versus 7907 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 3854 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 versus 323
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 versus 323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 2803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 423 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20661 | 7907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 3854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2339 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GP106B | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 11 January 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 562 | 563 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 977 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 1,000 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 31.26 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireMV 2250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
