NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon HD 7550M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon HD 7550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.9x more boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 768 vs 400
- 5.2x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 12.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 465
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20687 vs 5371
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 7 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 400 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 vs 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20687 vs 5371 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7550M
- 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 403 vs 323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 vs 323 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7550M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon HD 7550M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 403 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20687 | 5371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon HD 7550M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GP106B | Thames |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 7 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 563 | 561 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireMV 2250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5010M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
