NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 9.5x more texture fill rate: 123.0 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec
- 18x more pipelines: 1152 vs 64
- 30.7x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 128 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- 19.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9759 vs 504
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 vs 407
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2016 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s vs 13 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 128 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9759 vs 504 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 vs 407 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 120 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9759 | 504 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 | 407 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32423 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3849 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
| Code name | GP106 | G94 |
| Launch date | 18 August 2016 | 3 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 373 | 375 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | 128 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s | 13 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
AMDFirePro S9050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs
IntelArc A570M
