NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 706 MHz
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 3,524 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5200 MHz
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7901 vs 4432
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 210
• Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27871 vs 14510
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.271 vs 54.89
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1681.162 vs 1414.755
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.754 vs 5.303
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.592 vs 83.807
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 416.14 vs 250.291
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 8319
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 8319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

• Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
• Around 95% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1280
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3712
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3359
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3712
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7901 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	413 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	27871 14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.271 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1681.162 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.754 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	98.592 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	416.14 250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12767 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12767 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 10873

Compare specifications (specs)