NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 48.8x more texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 256x more pipelines: 2048 vs 8
- 389.9x better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 17.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 65 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 96.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 108
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 481
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 6 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops vs 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 481 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 125x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 | 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | 481 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47331 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5527 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
Code name | GP104B | G98 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 6 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 319 | 322 |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 540 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x DMS-59 |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |