NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 667 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 148.0 GTexel / s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 3,553 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 vs 6135
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 vs 553
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 vs 19220
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 47.147
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 vs 1278.433
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 3.996
- 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 115.307
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11173 vs 5946
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11173 vs 5946
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2016 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 667 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 771 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 148.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 3,553 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 vs 6135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 vs 553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 vs 19220 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 vs 47.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 vs 1278.433 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 vs 3.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 115.307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 vs 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 vs 5946 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 600.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 50.08 vs 27.417
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.08 vs 27.417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 | 6135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 | 553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 | 19220 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 47.147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 1278.433 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | 3.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 50.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 115.307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | 5946 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1560 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP104 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 27 May 2016 | 22 July 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $1,699.74 |
| Place in performance rating | 281 | 535 |
| Price now | $439.99 | $523.66 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | 14.51 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 667 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 3,553 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 148.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
