NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs Intel HD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and Intel HD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 12.8x more texture fill rate: 354.4 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s
- 149.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 24
- 25.7x better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
- 16.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 vs 1114
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 268
- 14.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67670 vs 4554
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 27.948
- 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 vs 312.246
- 10.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 1.795
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.833 vs 20.404
- 30.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 32.567
- 8.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 1859
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1945
- 8.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 1859
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1945
- 5.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2231 vs 388
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 March 2017 vs 30 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s vs 27.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops vs 441.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 vs 1114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 vs 4554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 vs 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 vs 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 vs 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 vs 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 vs 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 vs 388 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 5.8x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 11 GB
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 11 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 | 1114 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | 268 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 | 4554 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | 27.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | 312.246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | 1.795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | 20.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | 32.567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | 1859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 1945 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 | 388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | Intel HD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | GP102 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 10 March 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 219 | 1216 |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | 27.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 64 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 352 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5X | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |