NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon R9 390X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
11.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1050 MHz

Launch date	16 Mar 2020 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 1050 MHz

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X

2.8x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9443 vs 6417
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 vs 335
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11675 vs 9780
Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1982
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11675 vs 9780
Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1982
Around 34% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4242 vs 3172

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2816 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9443 vs 6417
PassMark - G2D Mark	819 vs 335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11675 vs 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3706 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11675 vs 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3706 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 1982
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4242 vs 3172

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6417

9443

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

335

819

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

11675

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

11675

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3350

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3172

4242

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark	6417	9443
PassMark - G2D Mark	335	819
Geekbench - OpenCL	39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780	11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2168	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1982	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780	11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2168	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1982	3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172	4242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2911.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		683.568

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 390X
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Code name	N18P-G62	Grenada
Launch date	16 Mar 2020	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	437	279
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$429
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	1035 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	2816
Compute units		44
Floating-point performance		5,914 gflops
Stream Processors		2816
Texture fill rate		184.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		275 Watt
Transistor count		6,200 million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size	medium sized
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		275 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
OpenGL		4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	512 bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	1050 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Memory bandwidth		384 GB/s
Shared memory		0
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore