NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 3.5x more core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
• 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6514 vs 1633
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39228 vs 10258
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 2315
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 2315

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile

• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 336
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3162 vs 2168
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 1982
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3162 vs 2168
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6514 1633
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	336 373
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39228 10258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9780 2315
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2168 3162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1982 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9780 2315
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2168 3162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1982 3339

Compare specifications (specs)