NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 192
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB or 1 GB
  • 13.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • 10.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6514 vs 631
  • Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 208
  • 17.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39228 vs 2224
  • 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 895
  • 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2168 vs 280
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1982 vs 519
  • 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 895
  • 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2168 vs 280
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1982 vs 519
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 vs 29 September 2014
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 797 MHz
Pipelines 1024 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB or 1 GB
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6514 vs 631
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 vs 208
Geekbench - OpenCL 39228 vs 2224
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 vs 895
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2168 vs 280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1982 vs 519
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 vs 895
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2168 vs 280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1982 vs 519

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6514
631
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
336
208
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39228
2224
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
895
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
519
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
895
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
519
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
PassMark - G3D Mark 6514 631
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 208
Geekbench - OpenCL 39228 2224
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 895
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2168 280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1982 519
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 895
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2168 280
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1982 519
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.418
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 142.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 17.317

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GT 720

Essentials

Architecture Turing Kepler 2.0
Code name N18P-G62 GK208B
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 29 September 2014
Place in performance rating 425 1590
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $49
Price now $54.99
Value for money (0-100) 15.44

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 192
CUDA cores 192
Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C
Texture fill rate 12.75 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Height 2.713" (6.9 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x8
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB or 1 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 DDR3 / GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5)

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA