NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 797 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB or 1 GB
- 13.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 10.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6514 vs 631
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 208
- 17.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39228 vs 2224
- 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 895
- 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2168 vs 280
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1982 vs 519
- 10.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 895
- 7.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2168 vs 280
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1982 vs 519
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 29 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB or 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 vs 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39228 vs 2224 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 vs 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 vs 519 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 | 631 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39228 | 2224 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 519 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 | GK208B |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 29 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 425 | 1590 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB or 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |