NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q versus AMD FirePro W7100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro W7100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 920 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 69.72 GTexel/s versus 103.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 11.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 400 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6210 versus 5251
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36406 versus 24871
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 versus 65.781
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 versus 5.854
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8824 versus 6362
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8824 versus 6362
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 12 August 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 920 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.72 GTexel/s versus 103.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 400 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6210 versus 5251 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36406 versus 24871 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.465 versus 65.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 versus 5.854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 versus 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 versus 6362 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W7100
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1792 versus 896
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 versus 327
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1248.285 versus 1047.553
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.086 versus 78.563
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 361.58 versus 346.529
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 896 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 versus 327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 versus 1047.553 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 versus 78.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 versus 346.529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | AMD FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6210 | 5251 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 661 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36406 | 24871 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.465 | 65.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.553 | 1248.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | 5.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | 94.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.529 | 361.58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2954 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | AMD FirePro W7100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU117 | Tonga |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 12 August 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 456 | 453 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1245 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz | 920 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.231 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.72 GTexel/s | 103.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 5,000 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,297 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 560
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 440
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 530v
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX550
