NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• 1606.5x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 400x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6222 vs 3901
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36290 vs 11526
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 vs 42.463
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1047.553 vs 642.715
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 2.933
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 vs 26.532
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 346.529 vs 133.458
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8824 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3329
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8824 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3329
• 25.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2954 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6222 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36290 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	129.465 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1047.553 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.88 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	78.563 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	346.529 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8824 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8824 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2954 117

Compare specifications (specs)