NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2346.9x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 4551
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 4551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 vs 2 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3715
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3357
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3715
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10162 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55772 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 17482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 17482 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4663 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 | 2 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 277 | 274 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,882 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 183 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
