NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 715x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10144 vs 7753
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55409 vs 40069
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 109.521
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1940.024 vs 1206.829
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.167 vs 9.88
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 511.984
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 10113
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2900
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 10113
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2900

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580

• Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 753
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 vs 102.69

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10144 7753
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	753 943
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55409 40069
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.926 109.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1940.024 1206.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.167 9.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.69 117.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	802.026 511.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3353

Compare specifications (specs)