NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 746.8x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10145 vs 9443
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 114.288
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.167 vs 10.947
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 683.568
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 11675
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 11675
- Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4669 vs 4242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10145 vs 9443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 vs 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 vs 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 vs 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4669 vs 4242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 2.2x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 vs 753
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 vs 1940.024
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 vs 102.69
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 1280 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 vs 753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 vs 1940.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 vs 102.69 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10145 | 9443 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55409 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4669 | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Grenada |
| Launch date | 22 Nov 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 269 | 279 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 6,200 million |
| Compute units | 44 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 275 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
