NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10145 versus 9443
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 versus 114.288
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.167 versus 10.947
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 versus 683.568
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 11675
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 11675
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4669 versus 4242
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10145 versus 9443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 versus 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 versus 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 versus 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 versus 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 versus 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4669 versus 4242 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 1280
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 753
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 1940.024
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 versus 102.69
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2816 versus 1280 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 versus 1940.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 versus 102.69 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10145 | 9443 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 753 | 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55409 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.926 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1940.024 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.167 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 102.69 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 802.026 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4669 | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Grenada |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 269 | 279 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $429 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 6,200 million |
| Unités de Compute | 44 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,914 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 275 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 512 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 M485X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
