NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1506 MHz
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
• 683.2x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 47476
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 150.951
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 vs 1718.593
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 vs 28.289
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 vs 710.366
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3340
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1280
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13504 vs 10180
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 751
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 vs 11.169
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 13569
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 13569
• 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1082 vs 352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10180 13504
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	751 847
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55838 47476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.014 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961.932 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.169 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.29 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	787.025 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	352 1082

Compare specifications (specs)