NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1506 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 versus 47476
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 versus 150.951
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 versus 1718.593
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 versus 28.289
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 versus 710.366
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3340
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3340
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 10 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1506 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 versus 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 versus 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 versus 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 versus 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1920 versus 1280
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13504 versus 10180
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 versus 751
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 versus 11.169
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 13569
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 13569
- 3.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1082 versus 352
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 1280 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13504 versus 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 versus 751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 versus 11.169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 13569 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1082 versus 352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 | 13504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 | 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 352 | 1082 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 10 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 283 | 288 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $379 | |
Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | 2-slot |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8 GB/s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |