NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1683 MHz
• 539.5x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 180 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 55424
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 vs 1797.792
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 vs 26.444
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3638
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3638

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• Around 90% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 1280
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 10180
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 751
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 vs 178.014
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 11.169
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 787.025
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 13569
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 13569
• 4.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1471 vs 352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10180 14696
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	751 876
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55838 55424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.014 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961.932 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.169 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.29 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	787.025 1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	352 1471

Compare specifications (specs)