NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 versus 55424
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 versus 1797.792
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 versus 26.444
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3638
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3638
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 2 November 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 versus 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 versus 26.444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3344 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 90% de pipelines plus haut: 2432 versus 1280
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 versus 10180
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 versus 751
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 versus 178.014
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 versus 11.169
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 versus 787.025
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 versus 13569
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 versus 13569
- 4.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1471 versus 352
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
Pipelines | 2432 versus 1280 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 versus 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 versus 751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 versus 178.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 versus 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 versus 787.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 versus 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 versus 13569 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 versus 352 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 352 | 1471 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 2 November 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 283 | 250 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |