NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• 784.1x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55409 vs 37536
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 145.843
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1940.024 vs 1722.98
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 102.69 vs 37.16
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 788.464
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 10471
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3695
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3338
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 10471
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3695
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3338

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

• 2.2x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1280
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13812 vs 10144
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 854 vs 753
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 vs 11.167
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5756 vs 4670

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10144 13812
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	753 854
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55409 37536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.926 145.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1940.024 1722.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.167 11.661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.69 37.16
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	802.026 788.464
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 10471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4670 5756

Compare specifications (specs)