NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 7750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 5165.2x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7535 vs 1191
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3551
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7535 vs 1191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750M
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 693 vs 385
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 693 vs 385 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 7750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7535 | 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 693 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 151.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1844.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 7750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Chelsea |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 289 | 288 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |