NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 590

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 175 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 151.899 vs 137.469
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3716
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3359
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3716
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9463 vs 7567
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 388
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 46561 vs 41946
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 1844.67
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 vs 10.683
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 115.919
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 762.142 vs 644.054
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 12180
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 12180
• Around 30% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4760 vs 3665

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7567 9463
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	388 796
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41946 46561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.899 137.469
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1844.67 2083.862
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.683 12.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.919 139.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.054 762.142
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3665 4760

Compare specifications (specs)