NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 4.5x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 1042
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 241
• 9.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 4592
• 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 27.062
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 273.504
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 vs 1.777
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 19.939
• 20.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 vs 31.881
• 8.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 1397
• 10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 878
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 2227
• 8.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 1397
• 10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 878
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 2227
• 59x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 62

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 241
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 62

Compare specifications (specs)