NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• 1422.3x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 7 GB/s
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 6332
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 20732
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 75.758
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 843.503
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 vs 5.071
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 24.676
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 vs 301.168
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 8496
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3687
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3336
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 8496
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3687
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3336
• 12x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 650
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 305

Compare specifications (specs)