NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3355
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3355
• 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 1061

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 vs 7539
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 380
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61100 vs 41907
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 152.235
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 1843.045
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 10.681
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 115.607
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 644.098
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 12180
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 12180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 12900
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 807
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 61100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 208.608
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 2573.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 16.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 145.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 926.614
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 1061

Compare specifications (specs)