NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3355
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3355
- 3.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 1061
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 22 February 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 1061 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12900 versus 7539
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 versus 380
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61100 versus 41907
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 152.235
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 1843.045
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 10.681
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 115.607
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 644.098
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 12180
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 12180
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 versus 7539 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 versus 380 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 versus 41907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 152.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 1843.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 115.607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 644.098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 12180 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 | 12900 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 807 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 | 61100 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 208.608 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 2573.643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 16.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 145.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 926.614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 | 1061 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU117 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 22 February 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 267 | 221 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
