NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• 2737.3x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 300x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 5.0 GB/s
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 3337
• 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 9306
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 34.239
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 639.427
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.681 vs 2.341
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 32
• 9.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 644.098 vs 69.814
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 4498
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3704
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3346
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 4498
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3704
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3346
• 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 1050

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 380

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7539 3337
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	380 515
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41907 9306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 2.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 69.814
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3656 1050

Compare specifications (specs)