NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 861 MHz
• Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• 715.1x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 11804
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3684
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 4193
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 11804
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3684
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 4193

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

• 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7915 vs 7568
• Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 389

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7568 7915
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	389 698
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 11804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 4193

Compare specifications (specs)