NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 vs 6150
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 89.187
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 7.656
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 87.459
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 493.57
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9603
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9603
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 8 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 vs 6150 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 vs 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 vs 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 vs 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 vs 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 569
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 vs 1316.075
- 7.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2351 vs 324
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 vs 1316.075 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 vs 324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 | 6150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 324 | 2351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU107 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 382 | 380 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |