NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon R9 280X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 versus 6150
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 89.187
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 7.656
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 87.459
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 493.57
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 9603
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 9603
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 8 October 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 versus 6150 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 569
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 versus 1316.075
- 7.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2351 versus 324
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 versus 1316.075 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 versus 324 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7878 | 6150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 324 | 2351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | TU107 | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 8 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 382 | 380 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.0 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | |
RAM maximale | 3 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |