NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 5x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 1358
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 338
• 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 6620
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 36.485
• 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 246.614
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 1.888
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 21.014
• 13.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 42.981
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 2306
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1514
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3333
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 2306
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1514
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

• 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 720 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 1358
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 6620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 36.485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 246.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 1.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 21.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 42.981
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 2306
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 720

Compare specifications (specs)