NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 444
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 31098
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 111.55
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 8.49
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 19.803
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 509.222
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3654
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3654

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 7881
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 vs 1316.075
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 10959
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 10959
• 12.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 8160
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 444
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 31098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 8.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 19.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 509.222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 3677

Compare specifications (specs)