NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 444
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 31098
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 111.55
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 8.49
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 19.803
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 509.222
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3654
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3654
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 15 August 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3654 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 versus 7881
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 versus 1316.075
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 versus 10959
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 versus 10959
- 12.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3677 versus 305
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 versus 7881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 versus 1316.075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 versus 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 versus 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 8160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 3677 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU107 | GP106B |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $237.11 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 385 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,275 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 133.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |