NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1266 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 3670
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 549
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 12475
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 43.877
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 773.248
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 3.082
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 53.425
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 184.343
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 3575
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 3575

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3715
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3358
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3715
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 3670
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 549
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 12475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 43.877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 773.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 3.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 53.425
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 184.343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 6631
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 6631

Compare specifications (specs)