NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA Quadro P620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1354 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7877 versus 3626
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 576 versus 558
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39332 versus 12475
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.955 versus 43.877
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1294.279 versus 773.248
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.756 versus 3.082
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.78 versus 53.425
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 569.916 versus 184.343
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 3575
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 3575
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 1 February 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1354 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7877 versus 3626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 576 versus 558 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39332 versus 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 versus 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 versus 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 versus 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 versus 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 versus 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 3575 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 3715
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3358
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 3715
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3358
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7877 | 3626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 576 | 558 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39332 | 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 6631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 6631 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3595 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU107 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 1 February 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 360 | 577 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |