NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3652
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3290
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 487
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 10205
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 16828
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 16828
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 487 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 10205 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 16828 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 869 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 | 19370 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5570 | 0 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N18E-G0 | TU102 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 117 | 103 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 18,600 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |