NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 280 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 4608 vs 1536
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 8622
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 364
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 53834
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 12301
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 12301
- 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 4912
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 1536 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 8622 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 364 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 53834 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 12301 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 4912 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8622 | 19986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 138072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4912 | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU116 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 18 December 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 333 | 90 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
