NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 960 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12930 versus 11355
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 versus 540
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6261 versus 5905
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 960 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12930 versus 11355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 versus 540 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6261 versus 5905 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 versus 16952
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 versus 16952
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12930 | 11355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 540 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61445 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6261 | 5905 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU106B |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 205 |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | $349.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | 62.74 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 10,800 million |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
IntelArc A530M
