NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 574 MHz
• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
• Around 28% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
• Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 2988 MHz
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 vs 24.377
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 793.755
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 2.66
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 34.891
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.575 vs 90.839
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 3501
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 3501

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000

• Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 210 Watt
• 4.8x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1280 MB
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 2133
• Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 2133

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.324 24.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1181.463 793.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.978 2.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.37 34.891
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.575 90.839
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4590 3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2133 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4590 3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2133 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3335

Compare specifications (specs)