NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 610 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 48.8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- 2x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 622.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 189 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3063 vs 1210
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 438 vs 80
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 January 2011 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 610 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s vs 48.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops vs 622.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 189 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3063 vs 1210 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 vs 80 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3319 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18229 vs 10721
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18229 vs 10721 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3063 | 1210 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 | 80 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10721 | 18229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3319 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF114 | GT200B |
Launch date | 25 January 2011 | 11 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $3,499 |
Place in performance rating | 799 | 1240 |
Price now | $138 | $178.89 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.88 | 8.02 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 610 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s | 48.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 189 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |